Possible modifications to enhance LexA-fused bait performance in specific applications:

Bait Problem
 
 
Response
strongly activating
weakly activating
not transported to the nucleus 
or
low expression level
Continuous expression of LexA-fusion is toxic to yeast 
Bait protein requires unblocked
amino-terminal end for function 
Bait protein expressed at high levels, unstable or interacts promiscuously 
truncate / modify bait
+
+
-
+
-
+?
Use more stringent strain/reporter combination 
-
+
-
-
-
-
fuse to nuclear localization sequence
pJK202
-
-
+
-
-
-
Put LexA-fused protein under GAL1-inducible promoter
pGilda
-
-
-
+
-
+?
Fuse LexA to the carboxy terminus of the bait
pNLexA
-
+?
-
+?
+
+?
Integrate bait, reduce concentration
pEG202I
-
+?
-
+?
-
+
Potential New Problem*
It may be necessary to subdivide bait into two or three overlapping constructs, each of which must be tested independently
Use of very stringent interaction strains may eliminate detection of biologically relevant interactions 
 
Can no longer use GAL-dependence of reporter phenotype to indicate cDNA-dependent interaction
Generally, LexA poorly tolerates attachment of the N-terminal fusion domain. Only ~60% of constructs are expressed correctly.
Reduced Bait protein concentration may lead to reduced assay sensitivity

 

+: would usually help; +?: may help; - : will not help

*: all of the alternative bait expression vectors remain on an AmpR selection for bacteria. If using them as is, the investigator may need to use a KC8 bacteria to isolate the library plasmid after a library screen.